Politically Correct Reasons for 4,000+ Dead Americans -- Lafcadio T. Lion and Strawberry Sage and Friends Fun Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:41:58 01/03/02 Thu
Author: Reportorial Lion
Author Host/IP: qam1b-sif-86.monroeaccess.net / 12.27.214.87
Subject: Politically Correct Reasons for 4,000+ Dead Americans

Dick Morris was an adviser to then candidate William Jefferson Clinton and continued to advise Bubba the Slut after he took office. In fact. Morris stuck with Clinton through most of his second term until it became clear that Hillary Clinton was going to try to throw Morris to the dogs to cover their fingerprints all over the evidence that Bill and Hillary presided over what is arguably the most corrupt administration in the history of this nation.

Morris is now a regular contributor to FOX News Network and does syndicated OP-ED pieces that continue to run in even the most liberal newspapers in this nation - those who supported Clinton and his henchmen in the Senate despite overwhelming and undeniable evidence that Clinton was - and is - a rapist, a mysogynistic sleaze and a sexual predator without the burden of any moral values whatsoever.

The very same Senator Tom Daschle who claims that Republicans are to blame for holding up the much needed economic stimulus package put forth by President Bush actually bragged about how the Democrats in the Senate had "no need for facts" when it came to refusing to oust Clinton. Daschle never disputes what Morris says because Dsaschle knows that Morris is telling the truth. Instead, in typical Democrat fashion, Daschle attacks the person because he has no other means of deflecting the truth of statements about Clinton. Anyone who lends any credence whatsoever to the pronouncements of Daschle is delusional at best.

Here is what Dick Morris wrote in the Wednesday edition of the New York Post about Bubba and his campaign against terrorism. Anyone who spoke in defense of Clinton should read this, realize that it is a report from one who was there and that what Morris says here has been substantiated many times over by an anti-terrorism expert now on the payroll of the Council of Foreign Relations (a decidedly LIBERAL organization). They should then realize that Clinton turned away offers to have Usama bin Laden turned over to the U. S. on three occasions while he was in office and after the PAM AM 103 and 1993 WTC attack. After reading this and acknowledging these now demonstrably proved beyond all reasonable doubt FACTS, the Clinton apologists and excusers ought to hang their heads in abject shame and apologize to the rest of us.

Here is Morris' Wednesday New York Post article:

CLINTON'S PRIORITY: POLITICAL CORRECTNESS OVER FIGHTING TERROR
By Dick Morris

Last month, President Bush shut down three U.S.-based "charities" accused of funneling money to Hamas, a terrorist organization that last year alone was responsible for at least 20 bombings, two shootings and a mortar attack that killed 77 people. These "charities" - The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the Global Relief Foundation and the Benevolence International Foundation - raised $20 million last year alone.

But the information on which Bush largely relied to act against these charities was taped nine years ago, in 1993. FBI electronic eavesdropping had produced compelling evidence that officials of Hamas and the Holy Land Foundation had met to discuss raising funds for Hamas training schools and establishing annuities for suicide bombers' families - pensions for terrorists.

Why didn't Clinton act to shut these people down?

In 1995 and 1996, he was advised to do just that. At a White House strategy meeting on April 27, 1995 - two weeks after the Oklahoma City bombing - the president was urged to create a "President's List" of extremist/terrorist groups, their members and donors "to warn the public against well-intentioned donations which might foster terrorism." On April 1, 1996, he was again advised to "prohibit fund-raising by terrorists and identify terrorist organizations," specifically mentioning the Hamas.

Inexplicably, Clinton ignored these recommendations. Why? FBI agents have stated that they were prevented from opening either criminal or national-security cases because of a fear that it would be seen as "profiling" Islamic charities. While Clinton was politically correct, the Hamas flourished.

Clinton did seize any bank accounts of the terrorist groups themselves, but his order netted no money since neither al Qaeda nor bin Laden were obliging enough to open accounts in their own names.

Liberals felt that the civil rights of suspected terrorists were more important than cutting off their funds. George Stephanopoulos, the ankle bracelet that kept Clinton on the liberal reservation, explains in his memoir "All Too Human" that he opposed the proposal to "publish the names of suspected terrorists in the newspapers" with a "civil liberties argument" and by pointing out that Attorney General Janet Reno would object.

So five years later - after millions have been given to terrorist groups through U.S. fronts - the government is finally blocking the flow of cash.

Political correctness also doomed a separate recommendation to require that drivers' licenses and visas for noncitizens expire simultaneously so that illegal aliens pulled over in traffic stops could be identified and (if appropriate) deported. Stephanopoulos cited "potential abuse and political harm to the president's Hispanic base," and said that he'd killed the idea by raising "the practical grounds of prohibitive cost."

Had Clinton adopted this recommendation, Mohammed Atta might have been deported after he was stopped for driving without a license three months before be piloted an American Airlines jet into the World Trade Center.

Nothing so illustrates the low priority of terrorism in Clinton's first term than the short shrift he gave the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the first terrorist attack on U.S. soil. Six people were killed and 1,042 injured; 750 firefighters worked for one month to contain the damage. But Clinton never visited the site. Several days after the explosion, speaking in New Jersey, he actually "discouraged Americans from overacting" to the Trade Center bombing.

Why this de-emphasis of the threat? In Sunday's New York Times, Stephanopoulos explains that the 1993 attack "wasn't a successful bombing. . . . It wasn't the kind of thing where you walked into a staff meeting and people asked, what are we doing today in the war against terrorism?"

In sharp contrast, U.S. District Court Judge Kevin Duffy, who presided over the WTC-bombing trial, noted that the attack caused "more hospital casualties than any other event in domestic American history other than the Civil War."

But Stephanopoulos was just the hired help. Clinton was the president and commander-in-chief. For all of his willingness to act courageously and decisively - against the advice of his liberal staff - on issues like deficit reduction and welfare reform, he was passive and almost inert on terrorism in his first term.

It wasn't until 1998 that Clinton finally got around to setting up a post of Counter Terrorism Coordinator in the National Security Council.

Everything was more important than fighting terrorism. Political correctness, civil liberties concerns, fear of offending the administration's supporters, Janet Reno's objections, considerations of cost, worries about racial profiling and, in the second term, surviving impeachment, all came before fighting terrorism.

# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

While we are choosing appropriate ways of dealing out death to bin Laden and his like, let's include Bubba the Slut in the planning. You now have it firsthand from someone who was in the inner circles of the Clinton administration from the first day. As far as I am concerned, William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Clinton are bot guilty of acts of treason against the people of this nation and ought to be subject to a legally imposed death penalty, carried out under the very same system of law each of them has held in disdain all along and with the support of people who place partisan politics and liberal ideals above what is right and proper. Any who would dare defend the Clintons in ANY WAY now are no better (IMO) than those who celebrated the attack on America on September 11^th.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Politically Correct Reasons for 4,000+ Dead Americans -- Rose, 11:38:55 01/06/02 Sun