Is it just me, or was anyone esle offended 2 -- Lafcadio T. Lion and Strawberry Sage and Friends Fun Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:49:58 02/21/03 Fri
Author: Z-Dr.
Author Host/IP: pool-151-196-241-117.balt.east.verizon.net / 151.196.241.117
Subject: Is it just me, or was anyone esle offended 2

To those who replied to Draggies original post, inclding Draggie and my self.

Did you see the rebuttle last night on Fox hosted by Mr. Povich.

Do you still have the same opinions you did by seeing one side of the story?

Now that you have seen another what do you think now?

Im curious to see if those who posted about a show that was on a famous person, that was advertised and denoted that person in negative light even bothered to put forth equal effort to watch a show which may have been more unbias, some of these same people who cry about the "liberal media".

Did we hear what we wanted to in the first show? See what we wanted to.

What about in the second, not hear what we expected? Not see what we expected? Did Fox delibereatley paint Michael Jackson in a positive light?

And if so.

couldnt have Bashire just have deliberately have attempted to paint Mr. Jackson in a negative light?

Or could what we saw and responded to been two versions of the same picture painted by the same artist?

MJ has so much money he doesnt have to give a damn what you and i think, perhaps he just doesnt like being messed with and proving to the wolrd during his shoping spree that he can get what he wants when he wants it because he wants it, and in his own admission of himself not wanting to grow up like Peter Pan, maybe he's just giving people something to talk about that he can control, he didnt have to give Bashire the grand tour, nor did he have to give Fox the rights to publish it nor did he have to allow them access to his private tapes or give permission to edit them as FOX wished. Both times MJ was in control.

Games of the rich and shameless?...You tell me!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Is it just me, or was anyone esle offended 2 -- Lafcadieaux T. L�on, gagging, 23:05:12 02/21/03 Fri
- Re: Is it just me, or was anyone esle offended 2 -- Draggie, 11:26:28 02/23/03 Sun
  - Re: Is it just me, or was anyone esle offended 2 -- Z, 15:26:23 02/23/03 Sun