VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:59:20 02/25/03 Tue
Author: Z-Dr.
Author Host/IP: pool-151-196-241-157.balt.east.verizon.net / 151.196.241.157
Subject: Re: A quick poll of thsoe who visit here
In reply to: I am curious tawny, Lion 's message, "A quick poll of thsoe who visit here" on 00:59:03 02/25/03 Tue

"Just out of curiosity, how do you folks feel about what France, Germany, Russia and China have been doing to the United States in the UN Security Council? Do their actions anger you or do you support them? Why do you think they are doing these things"

I understand France's position, they are axiously awaiting to try out there new DeGall(sp)tank. It has a 105mm gun, 1 forward speed and 20 in reverse. The gun carries no amunition what so ever but when fired, dispays the prettiest white flag you have ever seen and the fraze CHICKEN SHIT is written on the side.
Germany is another story all together. In Germanies current state of military readiness the better statement would be, Sorry to hear about Germany, because if the United States were to pull out of NATO who would be left? Germany and France? And France would surrender to any NY street gang that could afford airfair to France and since Germany depends on NATO for protection...oh well!

Russia is pissed becuase we are in Afghanistan to stay, on there back door and in position to over run the oil fields of the middle east, those we dont already have a great deal of control over already that is and it doesnt look like we wanna share we them! Look at a world map. See the coutries the U.S. has moved into and those Russia has moved out of, we are boxing them in slowly but surely, hell im surprized they have not made a pre-emtive strike against us.

When push comes to shove, France, Germany, Russia and China dont want anyone to know that they have been supplying tech. to Iraq..thats there motivation for doing what they are in the security council, hell it was us who gave them anthrax in the first place, thats why we know how much he has...duh! He used chemicals on the Kerds...damn him..20 years ago, if he were to have used chemicals on Iran...praise him??

Laf, this is amusing;

"Has the UN made itself into an irrelevant debating society? Do you think the United States must have UN approval before acting against Iraq if they fail to meet their obligations under 15 prior UN resolutons and continues to act in violation of the cease fire they requested in 1991?"

It has always been an irrelevant debating society and our Government adheres to it when it suits us and plays into our agenda. 14.41 left no room to wonder, nor did some 16 other resolutions, now all of a sudden G.W. wants another resolution, he wont debate with Sadam Insane because he's afraid he'll take a ass whippen mano e mano, thats the way it sounds to me. Dont get me wrong, i find the idea of a debate with Sadam Insane to be comedic. But it was a nice way of calling G.W. a P#2sy. We are still almost if not over 1 billion dollars behind in dues to the UN? Thats how much they really mean to our gorvernment, so much we can burn um for a billion bucks. Hey as long as we owe it to them we are not cheating them out of it ay?

"Should the US act against Iraq with the aid and support of over 60 nations around the world, how can anyone call that a "unilateral" act? Why would they try to characterize it that way?"

Go to the land of sand and kick his camel riding ass, just dont insult my intelligence about why we are doing it!!

"And, oh yeah, if Roy Rogers had died first, do you think Trigger would have had him stuffed and mounted?"

Trigger was the brains of the bunch, he would have thrown Roy to the buzzards and mounted Dale Evans.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:





Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]



Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.