VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, May 01, 01:48:17pm
Author: b
Subject: Re: The question was not relevant to the argument.
In reply to: Ace 's message, "The question was not relevant to the argument." on Friday, April 28, 11:07:39pm

to quote you: "...about collateral damage, President Clinton’s policy of bombing the Balkans into oblivion took more than it’s fair share of innocent victims. They are still rebuilding from the devastation. How can you subscribe to that policy and condemn President Bush for a more precise attack (which in reality has spared many innocent Iraqis) on the people who have ignored the operations of our enemies within their borders? You are intelligent enough to understand Musharraf in Pakistan walks a tight rope and leads the country by a slim majority while working with us as much as possible. Only a fool would try making that argument. You also seem to forget the area in which Bin Laden has chosen to hide is controlled by tribal peoples who do not recognize the higher authority and is largely un-policed."

YOU mentioned Clinton.....my question to you was: "How many died under Clinton versus the 2 bush presidents?"

I see you don't seem to be able to understand the question I asked you....how can I make it more simple for you to understand?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.