MuaDib Flaw Is Found in Software Used to Accredit Hospitals... -- Albany MSNBC Refugees Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Friday, June 24, 10:55:23pm
Author: BJ
Subject: MuaDib Flaw Is Found in Software Used to Accredit Hospitals...

remember the discussion we had about too much information being put on computers in hospitals. I was against it, while you kept saying 'nothing can go wrong...nothing can go wrong...nothing can go wrong...nothing can go wrong' Whack, sorry had to hit the computer to make it stop.

Published: June 24, 2005
A powerful national organization that enforces quality standards for hospitals said yesterday that it had found a flaw in software that it had sold to more than 1,000 hospitals, which use the program to help them qualify for accreditation and payments from Medicare.

Joint Commission Resources, a unit of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, disclosed the defect in a note on its Web site.

Many hospital officials across the country said they were reluctant to publicly criticize the commission, which sends auditors to check whether hospitals are meeting more than 1,300 criteria.

Robert Curran, director of clinical excellence at the O'Connor Hospital in San Jose, Calif., said many hospitals were concerned that they might have lost quality- control data already entered into their systems.

The software, which costs members several thousand dollars a year for hospital groups, and $495 to $1,095 for small hospitals, is used to help create files showing, for example, that a hospital has fully informed patients of their rights.

The problem was a missing identification marker that alerts a hospital to the 250 standards among the 1,300 that the commission and its auditors regard as essential. Without the marker, a hospital might overlook essential categories in which it must verify its compliance.

Hospitals failing to meet the essential standards must come into compliance within 90 days and demonstrate to auditors that they remain in compliance during the following four months, a commission spokesman said.

Diane Martin, the executive director of Joint Commission Resources, said in a telephone interview yesterday that the error was minor and would be fixed today. On its Web site, the joint commission said the error was "a production glitch."

Mr. Curran, however, described the problem as much more serious. "How about calling it an earthquake," he said.

Karen H. Timmons, chief executive of Joint Commission Resources, said it placed the notice of the error on its Web site "as soon as we learned of it." She said hospitals seeking accreditation were not required to use the Joint Commission Resources software.

Jeff Cleary, a spokesman for Xpediate Consulting, said his computer specialists found the omission a few days ago and warned hospital clients of possible problems. Xpediate sells software to assist hospitals with the Joint Commission requirements.

When administrators at several hospitals began asking Joint Commission Resources about the omitted markers, according to Xpediate officials, they were initially told that the markers would not be restored until the next update in August.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Sorry but... this isn't a big deal. -- MuaDib, Tuesday, June 28, 04:09:32pm
- Re: But interesting none the less...just when you thought it was safe to go into the water again... -- BJ, Thursday, June 30, 12:06:26pm