VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]
Subject: Re: why is paul at 31's and not 33's or 32's


Author:
HenryJ
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:47:42 08/05/02 Mon
In reply to: hobie 's message, "why is paul at 31's and not 33's or 32's" on 22:31:45 08/04/02 Sun
 At least with 31" he should have no rubbing issues, even in the worst conditions. And any bigger and a gear change would be a must ;)
A suspension lift really is the best way to lift. I would have gone that way too, but 5" is the smallest available. I wasn't looking for that much.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: why is paul at 31's and not 33's or 32'sPaul19:37:56 08/05/02 Mon

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.