I actually think we can do better than that with no risk. -- Carrera Panamerica Gang Wars game forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:42:04 07/03/02 Wed
Author: Diznank (Dank)
Subject: I actually think we can do better than that with no risk.
In reply to: Nasa 's message, "IMPORTANT READ THIS FIRST...BASIC GANG STRATEGY" on 09:43:07 07/03/02 Wed

My idea pretty much matches yours, but gets into a bit more specifics. As you say, spend turns on G.W., and NEVER recruit. Donate everything to the gang, and have the gang built casinos first and barracks second. Once those are built, players buy m16s and humvees.

But while we are building up, we will be getting some free units from our barracks. There is no reason we cannot be attacking during that time. Any money we earn there is bonus for the casinos, and since we will all be donating 100%, we can't LOSE anything is somebody retalliates against us. (We may lose units, but since nobody spent turns on recruiting, we are losing "free" units. And since your plan says don't attack until maxed out, by that time our units will be replenishing in a few hours, so again no reason not to attack.)

Just seems pointless to do nothing when we are in range of people with cash lying around.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> if the active players do give all the money back then no... -- Nasa, 10:59:05 07/03/02 Wed

there isnt really a risk. The problem would be people hanging on to cash then getting spread all over the rankings...but if all money "earned" goes into the gang then that makes sense.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]