VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:19:37 03/25/05 Fri
Author: Eppy
Subject: You Are Right Deb
In reply to: Deb 's message, "Am I misreading you, Eppy..." on 00:21:41 03/25/05 Fri

This case does have little to do with how we euthenize animals..but as I said above...I can see the pro death people using this case as an example of why we should allow physician assisted suicide, ESPECIALLY if it is deemed that Ms. Shiavo experienced pain or discomfort while she was allowed to starve to death. I can hear them say that none of her pain would have happened if her husband and doctor had been given another legal out to end her life humanly, since they determined that she had no quality of life. My feeling is, where does it end??? I have no problem with the tubes being taken out when a person is in a deep coma and MRI's show that the brain is destroyed and the person will never wake up. The line in this case is very gray, however. The experts disagree. This sets a bad presidence. Will it only be a matter of time before children born with severe downs sydrome or other abnormalities or elderly who other's feel have passed their usefulness be done away with? I think that President Bush's sentiments on the topic are very appropriate here (not a direct quote), he said that in matters such as these, it is best to err on the side of life. I couldn't agree more.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.