Chuck...Read this after you try the links again -- Notes from Zarahemla Political Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:31:29 07/21/05 Thu
Author: Eppy
Subject: Chuck...Read this after you try the links again
In reply to: Chuck in ND 's message, "Interesting" on 18:54:08 07/21/05 Thu

I can't disagree with this:

"But D&C 134 tells us that the govt exists to hold inviolate and secure for each person the free excercize of conscience. 11th AoF and all that. Let them think whatever, however they like. "

My problem is when they start to hurt others for what THEY think. Now I know that you are going to say that we do the same. Perhaps we do...perhaps we are trying to prevent others from coming into our country to do us harm for what we think. I guess that is for each of us to decide. I am by no means a warmonger. I wish this whole ugly mess who go away. My point has been that I don't think that they would stop, even if we did leave them alone. Sweden and the Netherlands have not been agressors, but they are having to deal with the problems of the fanatics and the problem is growing and I am afraid will continue to grow. You made the comment of "swatting at flys" (I think that is what you said without going back to check). I can see those who attack back because we attack and I can understand that. I think that there are many in the movement that I am speaking of that use that as a rally call to aid their cause and it works, because no one likes to be invaded by someone else, yet as I said, I think that they would be there reguardless of us at this point. Am I making any sense here?????

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Sorry... -- Chuck in ND, 15:28:10 07/22/05 Fri
- I Guess We Could Go Around on This Forever.. -- Eppy, 16:11:23 07/22/05 Fri