VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat December 20, 2003 12:56:58
Author: Liberal Christian
Subject: 閱讀就是解釋---聖經無誤論失去作用

聖經無誤論出發點是好的,企圖保護從聖經中提取的教訓絕對可信.

可惜閱讀本身就是解釋.

即使那本放在你桌上的聖經是無誤的,你一旦將它打開、閱讀,聖經的文字要經過你的腦袋解釋才能成為意義.而這個解釋的過程是受你的文化背景、教育、過往經驗、精神狀態等決定的.所以偏差甚至錯誤難以避免.如果你說你的解釋受聖靈的保守,你敢說你受聖靈保守的程度等同聖經作者所受的保守程度,以致你的解釋無誤嗎?

即使無誤的聖經存在,我們無法保證閱讀無誤.即是我們無法保證從聖經中提取的教訓無誤.聖經無誤論便失去作用了.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.