VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed December 24, 2003 15:49:16
Author: 虛與實
Subject: 聖經無誤論可不是你所指的方向
In reply to: Liberal Christian 's message, "閱讀就是解釋---聖經無誤論失去作用" on Sat December 20, 2003 12:56:58

聖經無誤論見基於至少二個前提:
1. 聖經是上主藉著眾作者所留下的話,由於上主不可以失信, 所以留下的聖言必須是信實可靠的.
2. 人的理智在經過亞當犯罪後已有所偏差, 因此以理智而閱讀聖經根本有誤, 所以這是對聖經這個原來文本而不是對讀者本人而說的. 因此必須假設有聖靈的幫助才可以完全明白聖經經文背後的真正意義(注: 與他/她個人的生活發生關係), 而一般人只能從字面上去理解聖經而覺得聖經只是在自相矛盾

簡單來說, 你好像分不清一個簡單的基本問題:
人類的理智是否直達上主? 還是必須通過上主的思典才可以上達?

不解決這個問題而直接論及聖經無誤論是否有作用, 是否太抽離其中的背景? 即十六世紀宗教改革時代二個改革口號: 唯獨恩典和唯獨聖經的內部關係及對應的事物, 即天主教的個人以理智尋找信仰及聖言加教會遺傳才是上主留給世人的全部.

此外, 宗教經驗猶如人人飲水, 冷暖自知, 簡單來說是一種體驗而無法客觀量度的事實, 你憑什麼質疑人家聖靈的感應不如眾聖徒? 若不同意的話, 簡單一點, 為什麼你可以證明你自己是一個基督徒而不是一個非基督徒? (不要跟我說守住聖經的戒律就是基督徒, 在新約中那些法利賽人同樣不是猶太教徒)

由此而見, 我不明白你在表達什麼?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.