Re: ah! a great double standard -- James Elite Board 2001! version 2.0

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: ah! a great double standard

Author:
Terry

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:35:42 10/04/00 Wed
In reply to: James 's message, "ah! a great double standard" on 01:33:55 10/01/00 Sun

But also look at it this way.... a baby is inside the mother and therefor part of HER body until birth. Then until the 7th month of being outside of mommy, the baby doesnt even realize that it is its own person! Allyson is just now figuring out that she is her own person. Its neat to watch them go through that month. So the baby doesnt even know it isnt itself until 7 months after birth.

> It seems for convenience sake that a wanted baby is
> "alive" and an unwanted baby is an "unviable, dead,
> tissue mass."
>
> I say it can't be both ways. It's either alive or not.
> And according to Biology, even a singular cell is
> considered alive.
>
> > if a baby is "not alive" until birth, why does
> someone
> > who kills a pregnant lady and her baby also dies
> > guilty of TWO murders?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
PS	Terry	18:36:36 10/04/00 Wed
Re: PS -- James, 23:37:55 10/04/00 Wed Re: PS -- Terry, 20:05:07 10/05/00 Thu