Re: bidding -- Rules Committee PRIVATE FORUM

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:09:49 09/13/00 Wed
Author: tracee
Subject: Re: bidding
In reply to: just threw it 's message, "Re: bidding" on 07:56:33 09/13/00 Wed

> our function is to do what the ladder wants as a whole.
that is my understanding.
our ladder community is declining-and i would bet that it declines even further.
we do not have the say as to what we want.
i'm looking at the lobby,at the forums, and seeing that people aren't happy with things.
do we want to end up with 190 people playing, ie, the 190 that voted for it?
or do we want to attempt to rectify the unhappiness with a re-vote?
this isn't rocket science, or politics, or anything that matters in the bigger sense of the word, its a game, and if something isn't working, we should try to make the 1000 people that didn't vote get into the voting booth and voice their opinion.
no WE can't overturn the vote, but it is OUR responsibility as the elected ladder reps to get this in for a re-vote so then if it passes again, its good, if not, it wasn't.what harm is a re-vote?its not he president of the united states or anything and would give us credibility that yes, we are listening to what people are saying.
we shouldn't subject what seems to be a large number of people to go to a different site to play.
our mission should be to simplify this and get the ones back that have already gone.
if you yourself are going to others sites, how many others are as well?
anyway,
it doesn't matter to me.i personally don't like it, but i did vote no for it as well, but this isn't about me.
i'll do what i have to do.
thanks,
tracee

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: bidding -- just threw it, 08:25:33 09/13/00 Wed