Re: Controversial religious ruling -- It's Debateable

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: Controversial religious ruling

Author:
Jen
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:07:07 06/26/02 Wed
In reply to: Astrid 's message, "Controversial religious ruling" on 16:11:03 06/26/02 Wed

It's about time. What a big "duh." But I am sure the US SCt will overturn it, "Ten Commandments" precedent notwithstanding. I just hope they do it before Asscroft (Oops! ;-) Now there's a guy who makes me want to learn "Oh Canada" and how to eat Tim Hortons doughnuts) tries to amend the Constitution over this idiotic issue.

Jen

PS--I'm not a fan of the Pledge or flag-burning amendments or any of that garbage because it smacks (to me at least) of Nazism. When symbols such as a synthetic flag Made in Taiwan and a silly chant become more important than the substance of our freedoms and the obligations of our citizenship, we're in big trouble.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Re: Controversial religious ruling Maria 18:35:58 06/26/02 Wed

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 19:33:17 06/26/02 Wed

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Jen, 06:27:12 06/27/02 Thu
Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Maria, 20:14:50 06/27/02 Thu

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 07:55:11 06/29/02 Sat

Re: Controversial religious ruling Astrid 23:06:20 06/26/02 Wed

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 17:52:23 06/27/02 Thu

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Jen, 19:19:49 06/27/02 Thu

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 07:56:39 06/29/02 Sat

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Astrid, 10:20:26 06/29/02 Sat

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 07:49:31 06/30/02 Sun

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Astrid, 17:01:26 06/30/02 Sun

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Astrid, 10:50:38 06/28/02 Fri

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 08:02:05 06/29/02 Sat

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Siannach, 13:54:53 07/01/02 Mon

Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 00:52:07 07/02/02 Tue

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.