Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: Controversial religious ruling Author: Astrid [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 23:06:20 06/26/02 Wed In reply to: Jen 's message, "Re: Controversial religious ruling" on 17:07:07 06/26/02 Wed >It's about time. What a big "duh." But I am sure the >US SCt will overturn it, "Ten Commandments" precedent >notwithstanding. I just hope they do it before >Asscroft (Oops! ;-) Now there's a guy who makes me >want to learn "Oh Canada" and how to eat Tim Hortons >doughnuts) tries to amend the Constitution over this >idiotic issue. Well, O Canada contains the line, "God keep our land glorious and free"... and Svend Robinson's attempt to change the lyric didn't go over up here. I have a funny feeling you'd catch right on to the whole doughnut eating experience, btw... I'm a pro myself, LOL. Astrid [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Controversial religious ruling Alan 17:52:23 06/27/02 Thu Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Jen, 19:19:49 06/27/02 Thu Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 07:56:39 06/29/02 Sat Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Astrid, 10:20:26 06/29/02 Sat Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 07:49:31 06/30/02 Sun Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Astrid, 17:01:26 06/30/02 Sun Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Astrid, 10:50:38 06/28/02 Fri Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 08:02:05 06/29/02 Sat Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Siannach, 13:54:53 07/01/02 Mon Re: Controversial religious ruling -- Alan, 00:52:07 07/02/02 Tue