Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Re: HKCEE Results Author: Toby [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 08:53:23 08/09/02 Fri In reply to: Toby 's message, "HKCEE Results" on 18:10:32 08/07/02 Wed Lam of course I agree, you've known me and my opinion on that issue for long. However, since the majority of the boys have to stay within the sysytem unlike some more fortunate few, I would like to see WY beomce gardually more competitive within the same system and would prefer all WY F.5 boys receive a more favourabel treatment in general by employers recruiters and Universiity admission officers who can oly look at thier testimonials. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: HKCEE Results Author: Toby [ Edit | View ] Date Posted: 08:59:20 08/09/02 Fri I have often amde funny remarks without any genuine intent of insult for the poor souls who fit my remark but the spirit I mean with my remark is worht contemplating. "Those obidient class monitor types never end up as great successes where as the naughty and eye-sore for the teachers end up as something somwhat more successful" IAs I am making an open statement here I would qualify that this statement does not scientifically quantiy "Success". I would never demean a school teacher by suggesting he is less successful than a merchant bank director (providede the teachr is a good and sincere one). But most would catch my drift.