VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]
Subject: Re: Official vs. Not Official


Author:
TrekGOD
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:05:25 10/17/02 Thu
Author Host/IP: NoHost/65.163.170.203
In reply to: Warspite 's message, "Re: Official vs. Not Official" on 09:26:11 10/17/02 Thu

>>Ok, if we are going to have debates about what is and
>>what is not offical. We should recognize that if you
>>say that something like a Technical Manual is not
>>official then don't turn around and quote from it then
>>say later in the same message that it's not.
>
>The rules of the forum are clear. TMs are allowed, but
>if they conflict with the show in specific cases, then
>they are considered to be wrong in that case.
>
If you don't like the rules, then debate elsewhere.

every trekie's the same.

>>I've
>>read 3 or for things on this forum that some of the
>>more rabid trekies have said that was word-for-word
>>out of the ST: The Next Generation Technical Manual. I
>>have the technical manuals and I know what they say on
>>most of the subjects that we've discussed here. If
>>your going to say it is not official that is fine, but
>>don't turn around and quote from it when it serve's
>>your ability to make star trek look better. I'm not
>>taking sides but if you claim something is not
>>official then don't turn around and use it in the
>>debates. (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE) wrspt
>
>The rules are clear, and are on the website for all to
>see. I always stick to those rules. Again, if you
>don't like them then please don't whine, just go away
>and debate elsewhere. I don't mean to be rude, but I
>set this forum up with those rules, and that is the
>end of the story.

Ok, so you setup the forum to abide by your rules only. Heh, you close minded control freak.


>
>>
>>Furthermore, the Technical Manuals (no matter what you
>>guys scream and wine about being "cannon") are
>>official material for both Star Wars and Star Trek.
>>In fact in Star Wars eveything with the Lucas symbol
>>on it is official meaning that even the Role Playing
>>Material is officialy endorsed by Lucas Arts, Lucas
>>Films, Lucas Entertainment, Skywalker Sound, and
>>Industrial Light and Magic.
>
Actually, that is not true. Lucasfilm has de-canoned
(is that a word?) anything with the 'infinities' logo
on it.

and where the heck did you see or hear that from?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Official vs. Not OfficialWarspite08:50:17 10/21/02 Mon


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+1
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.