| Subject: Re: Official vs. Not Official |
Author:
Warspite
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 08:50:17 10/21/02 Mon
Author Host/IP: ipd54b1939.free.wxs.nl/213.75.25.57 In reply to:
TrekGOD
's message, "Re: Official vs. Not Official" on 16:05:25 10/17/02 Thu
>>The rules of the forum are clear. TMs are allowed, but
>>if they conflict with the show in specific cases, then
>>they are considered to be wrong in that case.
>>
>If you don't like the rules, then debate elsewhere.
>
>every trekie's the same.
>
I'm sorry you don't like the rules. They are basically the same as on the other vrs sites (ie Spacebattles, asvs). I guess this isn't the place for you then.
>>The rules are clear, and are on the website for all to
>>see. I always stick to those rules. Again, if you
>>don't like them then please don't whine, just go away
>>and debate elsewhere. I don't mean to be rude, but I
>>set this forum up with those rules, and that is the
>>end of the story.
>
>Ok, so you setup the forum to abide by your rules
>only. Heh, you close minded control freak.
So you go straight to the insults. I set up this forum to debate civilly with other people. It seems that is not possible after all. At least not with you. :(
>Actually, that is not true. Lucasfilm has de-canoned
>(is that a word?) anything with the 'infinities' logo
>on it.
>
>and where the heck did you see or hear that from?
It was stated by Chris Cerasi of Lucasbooks, and confirmed by Steve Sansweet, the Lucasfilm Fan Relations manager. The quote is.....
"Returning to the question at hand. Yes, Star Wars Gamer is part of continuity, though as game material, there is room for interpretation. Only specific articles marked with the 'Infinities' logo within the magazine should be considered out of continuity."
Of course I wouldn't expect you to believe me, so here's a link to the starwars site.
http://www.starwars.com/community/askjc/steve/askjc20010817.html
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |