| Subject: Re: Revised Dominion vs Empire |
Author:
capn hayes
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 02:20:24 09/05/02 Thu
Author Host/IP: NoHost/207.14.48.2
In reply to:
trekie
's message, "Re: Revised Dominion vs Empire" on 20:02:07 09/04/02 Wed
>>>>
>>>>Hate to break the bad news to TrekTARD but
>>Turbolasers
>>>>aren't simply glorified flashlights. You go ahead
>and
>>>>stick with PhysicsTARD. Let me break this down for
>>>>you, If a Turbolaser were in the "real life" Star
>>Trek
>>>>universe, according to you it would look like this!
>>An
>>>>idiot Starfleet ensign would say "Sir,their weapons
>>>>while large and powerful looking, are nothing more
>>>>than light amplified through the stimulation of
>>>>emmitted radiation, ancient 20th century technology
>>on
>>>>a large scale. Our navigational deflector is
>designed
>>>>to block that form of EM Field frequency bandwith
>>>>captian."
>>>
>>>well that's exactly what they are!(Here is another
>>Trekling wet dream, realized!)
>>>
>>>I even used the long technical explanation
>>>>just like they would use. Now heres what would
>happen
>>>>once negotiations breakdown. The Star Destroyer
>>levels
>>>>her sights on the Federation starship, and in a
>>awsome
>>>>light show all the laser light is brilliantlt and
>>>>harmlessly shunted away from the mighty navigational
>>>>deflectors. Oops! Did we forget something oh yeah?
>>Hey
>>>>Star Wars people I think we should let our good
>>little
>>>>Starfleet captain in on little error his tactical
>>>>officer just made. Like the
>>>
>>>731,500 Petajoules of anti-proton particles
>>>
>>>sorry to bust your bubbles but the nav dish is
>charged
>>>with anti-protons... per ST:FC(Bad example Trekkie,
>>the only thing busted here is your starship's shield
>>bubble.)
>>
>>
>>>AND! Yeah it was, what is your point Trekling? It was
>>also stated that if it were to be hit with even a
>>phaser rifle blast it would destroy half the ship!
>>Which by your own addmission would indicate that
>>antiprotons are indeed powerful. There are other
>>little examples of antiprotons being mentioned in
>>Trek, antiproton beams can also be used to detect
>>cloaked ships "Defiant" [DS9]. Again they were
>>mentioned in Voyager when they were used to destroy
>>mutant DNA it Tom Paris's body, "Threshold" [VGR].
>>They were also shown in "The Q and the Grey" [VGR] to
>>be able to increase shield strength by ten fold. My
>>point Trekling is this. There are aparently many uses
>>for antiprotons some (like use in weapons and
>>defensive systems) are beyond Federation technology. I
>>backup that claim by refering you to the examples
>>above "Doomsday Machine" [TOS] and later in "The Q and
>>the Grey" [VGR]. Both give the impression that
>>Starfleet doesn't have the weapons technology. But
>>they can use antiprotons in medical, scanning, and
>>navigational deflectors, as long as the dish ain't hit
>>by phasers they'll be okay, otherwise BOOM! TrekTARD
>>loses again.
>
>The dish is charged with Anti-Protons that are
>projected into the sheild grid to protect the ship
>from anti-proton weapons such as turbolasers.
And why would a star Trek ship Need that kind of protection? I don' remember any Turbolasers ever being fired at a trek ship! Besides their just glorified flashlights remember. Unless your agreeing that Turbolasers are more thatn just LASERS. In any case you maybe right about particle protection. But then what are the tactical deflector shields for?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 