VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: Re: star wars vs. star trek tech. 2


Author:
26138
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:07:16 08/05/02 Mon
Author Host/IP: dialup69-239.livermore-dialup.trvnet.net/64.71.69.239
In reply to: kyee7k 's message, "star wars vs. star trek tech. 2" on 13:04:39 08/05/02 Mon

>i believe that star trek technology will go through
>more changes than star wars has in the last 20000
>years of its existence. case in point
>1. star wars galatic civilization is about 20000
>years old, and yet has not united the galaxy in one
>giant republic. where are the older civilizations?
>are there any?
>2. the collective group known as the federation has
>gone through more technological changes through the
>short 300 years of its existence than most
>civilizations go through in about 500 years (compare
>b5 before and after intervention.
>3. drive system has gone through amazing leaps from
>the earlier intrasystem jumpdrives they call
>hyperdrive to a theoretical model of transwarp drive
>in about 300 years.
>4. working model of surface capacitance in st, while
>still trying to figure out how it works in sw.
>5. two proton torpedoes and one a-wing broke through
>defenses and shields of a ssd to totally incapacitate
>ship (i still shudder at this)
>6. inability to track starfighters. clarification:
>when the computers are fast enough and powerful enough
>to regulate several large fusion generators,i.e.
>particles within reaction chamber are traveling at or
>near c=300000000 meters per second; then calculating
>and eliminating starfighters should be a cakewalk.
>7. ion drives are not more advanced than impulse
>drives. in fact have the ability to warp space and
>then "pushing" off of it encompasses more concepts (if
>it were true)than just propelling excited molecules
>through an exhaust.
>8. really a gripe about ep. 1 of sw prequel . if
>you have a little knowledge about economics then you
>should have recognized how outlandish the republic
>currency not being valuable on tatooine should have
>been. the old republic like the united states has one
>of the most robust economies available within the
>galaxy. now you tell me that a civ. whose currency is
>traded on 3/4 of galaxy is not valuable on even a
>remote planet like tatooine has got to be nuts.
>9. in the han solo trilogy, we find out that
>antimatter is very experimental. meaning it's used
>only in the laboratory on carida. when you consider
>that antimatter is closely related to fusion
>generation, then you begin to question huh?
>9. if you've read federation by judith and garth
>reeves, then you know that some of the ideas of it are
>really outlandish but possible. zero point energy
>extraction (primitive version would be the buzzard
>array),transwarp drive beyond transwarp (sidewarp
>factor and sidespace),a centralized computer system
>and an artificial contruct such as data (in sw realm
>there is only guri) extra galactic travel.
>10. the ability to travel in multiple universes, and
>have the ability to create portals to other universes.
>
>11. since 4000 years ago during the rise of the sith,
>not one innovation has been made in terms of tech.
>they still use solar sails even when they have fusion
>generators (huh?)oh sure, you have improved mapping of
>the galaxy via hyperspace routes, but i can't seem to
>see any more improvements beyond the occassional
>improvement such as a type of computer chip, etc.
>i'm not saying that the star trek tech is more
>advanced than star wars tech, but for its age(approx.
>20000 year space civilization) it should have already
>surpassed many of these concepts ages ago
>(concepts=pseudo-science). in fact they should
>already be on par, or just below what would be
>classified as ordinary for the voth, but the sw
>universe is backwards and really slow in terms of most
>of their technology and the rate of change.
>in essence the new republic ships should have
>shattered the yuzhang vong during its first encounter.

I also think the SW universe has had little progress in 20000 years. Give the Fedeeration 20000 years, and you won't know what hit you!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: star wars vs. star trek tech. 2TrekGOD01:08:00 08/27/02 Tue


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+1
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.