VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:56:47 06/18/04 Fri
Author: Anti
Subject: Got the films Dio, My Thoughts

Thx 4 the films most helpful. I agree with most of the strats with jus some minor adjustments in mind though its up to you whether you want them implemented or not :)

Hver:

I think its a sound plan. I was initially worried about all the wights since I didnt think Np would fall for it but if we put most of them in from the closest river bed like you did, i think they stand a greater chance of success. Also the flank closest to the starting point with the super warrs (I dunno what they're called :O) my only suggestion really is to split them in half when crossing and converge again past the bend. This is just because I think if Np sees a lot of units banded together they will immediately branch off more units to attack it. I know that it would in turn weaken mid but I see mid more as a blocking/defending force as opposed to an offensive one. I also see the other flank more as a delaying force.

Trow:

Pretty much the same as the strat against F but I liked it anyways :) My only comment is having 2 trow on the S flank and the other 1 to go N initially, cross to other flag, then back to mid to cause havoc/help out mid. On the one hand it will help our mid if they run into any trouble or even help mid push, but on the other hand if S flank faces 3 trow, the S flank will be in trouble. If the latter occurs it may be possible for mid to push and for S to act as a delaying force as I did in the match against F, but if mid cant push and S cant push we'd be in trouble therefore..... your call :)

Smells:

Quick flag guide so I don't confuse y'all :)

8 1 2
7 3
6 5 4

- If we start at 5 -

Guarding flag 4 is a good plan. I suggest going to 7 with the other large group since Np are good and therefore I doubt we'll get to 3 first. I like the ghol pack goin to 8 then to 2. the group going to 7 will likely run into trouble, if not then going to 1 is a good idea. I think the heron pack should go to 1 or 2 via mid and either help out 7 or go to 3. Also I would prefer it if each lock had 2 heron with it. This does make the heron pack smaller but I prefer it that way :)

- If we start at 1 -

Almost the same as the 5 start but in reverse. Guard flag 2, but go to 3 instead with other group. I havent seen a 1 start reach 7 before a 5 start unless the nme go off flag. Again heron down middle to 5 or 6 (mb even split half go 6 half go 4) and I think ghol pack should go down the far right to 4.

We need to defend 1 flag imperatively and the second flag defend as dio says just for a short bit of time just to give the heron and ghol pack time to tag.

And thats a wrap for what I thought, hope its useful :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.