Re: Team Finances - A solution? -- Great White Rumour Mill

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

Subject: Re: Team Finances - A solution?

Author:
SteeltownGM

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:25:47 08/31/03 Sun
In reply to: Yellowknife 's message, "Re: Team Finances - A solution?" on 13:54:46 08/28/03 Thu

This is agreed. Going back to that other league with the super Rangers and my Kovalchuk/Heatley/Nash team: (there are a lot of similarities between that league and this one) we had a challenge. Every year a cash bonus was laid out for the most active GM's. (Activity was determined based solely on how many sets of lines were received by the commissioner). Based on message board articles, each team received $25,000 for a league based article of at least 200 words (it might have been 100 words, I don't remember) (that wasn't filled with gibberish). The exception to this were articles deemed as 'league interest'. League Interest articles that qualified were: Top 3 players of the day, player/goaltender of the week, Power Rankings, and articles of a similar nature.

>Before this is a go, I think we should spell out
>exactly what counts as an article. There should be a
>minimum number of words perhaps, and there should also
>be a maximum number of articles per week so that teams
>aren't spamming to get rich. Just my $0.02
>
>>I'd be willing to do something like this for 200,000
>>an article as long as we could have someone keep track
>>of how much money everyone gets and let me know on a
>>weekly basis. Do I have a volunteer?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]