VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Re: Assignment #3


Author:
Savannah Simpson
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:55:17 06/19/10 Sat
In reply to: Kathryn Milford 's message, "Re: Assignment #3" on 14:54:03 06/19/10 Sat

>Before this lesson, I did not know much about IQ
>testing. In fact, until this assignment, I do not
>recall ever having taken an IQ test. During
>elementary school and high school, I remember taking
>assessment type tests like ITBS (Iowa Tests for Basic
>Skills) or the ACT. In these types of tests as well
>as IQ testing, I feel that the content of the
>questions posed are a good assessment of one’s
>intelligence. However, I have never been fond of
>timed tests. I believe if someone knows the material,
>then they know the material. Just because the
>processing of information might take longer for some
>individuals does not mean they are not intelligent.
>Of course, my feelings contradict the definition of
>intelligence give to us. For the majority of my
>educational career, I have been an A/B student, so I
>would guess my IQ is at least 100 (maybe a little
>higher).
>
>After taking the three different IQ tests, my opinion
>has slightly changed. I believe the classical IQ test
>to be a good assessment of intelligence; however, I
>found it hard to believe that the culture-fair IQ test
>could be a good assessment. The whole test was
>patterns and sequences which I felt only addressed the
>mathematical side of an IQ test. How does that test
>address one’s verbal comprehension? As for the
>emotional intelligence test, I enjoyed taking it.
>Although, I could see how this test might produce
>false results if the test taker is not honest in his
>or her answers. As for me, my results confirmed my
>predictions about my IQ. The hardest test for me was
>the culture-fair IQ test. There were several
>questions where I could not figure out the pattern or
>how to finish the sequence.



I agree with your opinion concerning the cultural IQ test as being a not very good means of measurement. It is also hard for me to understand how using shapes, colors, and different sizes of objects can predict ones IQ. I wonder if they actually use this in many parts of IQ testing? I think the best predictor of all three tests is the classical IQ test as well.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.