Re: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge -- Politicsvt

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:35:10 03/26/03 Wed
Author: Mr. Big
Subject: Re: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
In reply to: Captain America 's message, "Re: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge" on 11:03:27 03/26/03 Wed

The stats dispute the amount of oil in ANWR not that conserving/ increasing fuel efficiency saves petro. I'll get the figures nad get back to you. Don't try to pretend that you thought anyone was disputing that conservation means less fuel use.

>There are sources of data that dispute that small
>increases in fuel efficiency standards result in huge
>savings of petroleum, resulting in decreased
>dependence on foreign sources of oil, increased
>homeland security and huge $$ savings for Americans at
>the pump? Interesting.
>
>The fact is that increasing fuel efficiency standards
>makes sense.
>
>What is also interesting is that some folks in this
>room have been advocating for drilling in ANWAR
>without citing any specifics on why it is a good idea.
> Now that I have given specifics on why it is not a
>good idea, the pro-drilling folks decide that, "there
>is no sense of even bringing it up."

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge /opposing stats -- James, 06:34:24 03/28/03 Fri

ride a bike -- Bulldogscm, 08:51:37 03/28/03 Fri

Re: ride a bike -- James, 11:36:39 03/28/03 Fri