VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:12:55 05/15/04 Sat
Author: ketch - 14 Apr 2004
Subject: Re: Sri Yukteswar Ashrams
In reply to: joe - 14 Apr 2004 's message, "Sri Yukteswar Ashrams" on 04:12:22 05/15/04 Sat

The Puri ashram was in the charge of Hariharananda while he was with YSS. He split with YSS around 1973 and kept control of the ashram.

YSS tried to regain control by litigation, but Hariharananda won the case on the basis of having occupied the ashram for a significant time.

The Indian law may be from English civil law which allows someone who has occupied a premises unopposed for 12 years to claim ownership.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.