VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:16:59 07/25/03 Fri
Author: Eponymous - 20 June 2003
Subject: Re: The infallibility of the Guru
In reply to: ketch - 17 June 2003 's message, "Re: The infallibility of the Guru" on 00:12:54 07/25/03 Fri

"I believe that Anil Nerode wrote here that he did not remove his site because of any legal threats from SRF, but for other reasons (people quoting parts out of context all over the internet - and because it caused offense to some)."

I believe Nerode expressed (and this may have been personal correspondence to me) that the prospect of SRF litigation against him was at least a significant factor in his decision to remove the relevant portions of his site.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.