You mean, CANZEWSNI? Sounds like a Polish swear-word -- FCS Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: You mean, CANZEWSNI? Sounds like a Polish swear-word

Author:
Ed Harris (Venezia)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:50:06 11/28/04 Sun
In reply to: David Hicks 's message, "CANZUK?" on 21:54:03 11/27/04 Sat

Besides, even CANZUK is just a convenient shorthand to save us the bother of writing of writing out "Canada, Austalia, Zew Zealand and the United Kingdom" all the time. I don't think that anyone is seriously proposing 'CANZUK' as the official name for a federal commonwealth. Apart from the awkwardness of the acronymn, it suggests the existence of four distinct countries, which is not what it's all about, is it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: "four distinct countries"

Author:
Ian (Australia)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:53:31 11/28/04 Sun

I'm not sure whether CANZUK is about four distinct countries, or seven distinct countries, or something (conceptually) beyond. I rather like the idea of a federation of provinces where everyone (Victorian, Scot, New Zealander, Albertan, East Midlander) has the same relationship to a global identity, but I can't help thinking that it is unlikely to start at that point.

Our national identities are already pretty well established emotionally, and I feel it may take generations to build up to another stage. After all, it took time for the australian colonies to feel that they were all "Australian" together.

CANZUK as the official name? No, can't see that. As a common usage? Yeah, why not? I don't think it is so ugly as all that.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> Subject: one country
Author: Owain (UK) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 19:33:15 12/01/04 Wed I believe Britain to be a single country, not four. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]