Re: missing from constitution -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: missing from constitution

Author:
Alice

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:55:37 10/21/03 Tue
In reply to: arses 's message, "Re: missing from constitution" on 20:25:36 10/20/03 Mon

>not meaning to throw a spanner in the works, but i'm
>90% sure that SUDA 2002 int. was WQV. so if it was
>WQF last year, should it not be WQT this year...?
>
I danced it too and I thought it was WQT. BUT I have just found the results from SUDA 2000-2001 (thank you Oxford) and that was WQF!! Which means we've gone awry somewhere already.

But more to the point, this year's IVDA are doing T so we mustn't. Therefore, given that it definately was F last year it's going to be V! Hope that makes sense.

>haven't a clue re. latin coz danced novice at SUDA
>2002.

Join the club! Much love, A :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: missing from constitution	Robin	11:45:43 10/21/03 Tue