Re: missing from constitution -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: missing from constitution

Author:
Robin

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:45:43 10/21/03 Tue
In reply to: Alice 's message, "Re: missing from constitution" on 10:55:37 10/21/03 Tue

>I danced it too and I thought it was WQT. BUT I have
>just found the results from SUDA 2000-2001 (thank you
>Oxford) and that was WQF!! Which means we've gone
>awry somewhere already.

I think something has gone wrong... there used to be a constitution somewhere that had both SUDA and IVDA dances in it...

but generally the rule seems to be that the 3rd dance at SUDA is the dance not danced at all at IVDA, and the 4th dance at SUDA is the same as the 4th dance at IVDA.

so if IVDA is WQT, WQTV
SUDA should be WQF, WQFV

Thus ensuring that each of the 3 non-team dances is danced in two events (either in the int. and adv. at one of SUDA/IVDA or in the Adv. at both)

I'm not sure this was the intention, but it looks like it...

Anyway, I believe the past 4 SUDC intermediates were:
2000: T (ivda V)
2001: F (ivda T)
2002: V (ivda F)
2003: ?F? (ivda V)
2004: ? (ivda T)

I reckon that in fact SUDA 2003 *should* have been T, and 2004 should be F. (And V as the 4th dance at both SUDA and IVDA).

Of course it doesn't really matter, but it's probably good to get back into some form of sensible rotation, rather than having the same dance at SUDA and IVDA.

Robin

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]