| Subject: Re: punishments |
Author:
Caroline
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 15:28:49 05/26/03 Mon
In reply to:
Robin
's message, "Re: punishments" on 12:28:01 05/26/03 Mon
I meant if the rule was passed, team captains are liable...
I know everyone says that it's a slim chance, but it could happen. And technically it could happen for the rules that already exist so surely the team captain should have control, and if they follow the guidelines, there is no prob...
Don't know really, I just laughed when I read that, as if the standing committee did not like me (Very likely as am sure there are at least 3 people out there) then technically, if my beginners try and ignore me, then my soc is fined, and has to close down as we have no money...
But then I have control for the most part...
Was just a thought that the standing committee should not be able to impose punishments without the GM consent, since it would be a big deal...
Sorry, being freaky thinking through all these things...
>Why don't you all just have a look at the constitution
>before commenting on it... the SC can fine member
>societies and/or ban individuals if they are in breach
>of the constitution. The constitution says nothing
>about which level people may enter, so the SC cannot
>impose fines in that case.
>
>It could, though i've never heard it happen, fine a
>member society if they were found to breach of any
>other of the IVDA rules, e.g. let ineligable
>competitors dance in the team match, enter
>non-beginners in beginners, wear competitive dress in
>NCD events or the like.
>
>If the rule regarding opens entries had been passes,
>the SC could conceivably have fined societies for this
>too. I think the chance of any fines being imposed are
>extremely slim, as far as i know all disputes this
>year have been settled more or less amicably...
>
>Robin
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 