Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ] |
| Subject: The 'fly' in the Fly2 | |
Author: Steve in the UK | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 14:53:58 10/26/01 Fri Does anyone else think that the monster should have been more human in appearance due to the lower percentage of fly genes that he should have inherited? In my opinion, the second 'fly' was not nearly as shocking and is not an accurate follow on from the 86 film. Steve [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> Subject: Re: The 'fly' in the Fly2 | |
|
Author: The Crow [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 18:44:57 10/26/01 Fri Of course, because: 1. It was a rip-off of the '86 movie. 2. It was a simply a monster/slasher movie, as oppose to brilliany '86 movie. Chris Walas has done a fantastic job for the makeup of "The Fly". But as a director, he can't get to the tip of the talent of Cronenberg. [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> Subject: :-) Re: The 'fly' in the Fly2 | |
|
Author: Greg [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 09:23:03 10/27/01 Sat >Of course, because: >1. It was a rip-off of the '86 movie. >2. It was a simply a monster/slasher movie, as oppose >to brilliany '86 movie. > >Chris Walas has done a fantastic job for the makeup of >"The Fly". But as a director, he can't get to the tip >of the talent of Cronenberg. Exactly. [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> Subject: Re: The 'fly' in the Fly2 | |
|
Author: Mutronborg [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 07:30:38 11/15/01 Thu The film might have been terrible in that sense. but it sure was satisfying to see martin kill all the people who did him wrong in life. *scorby get broken in half* [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |