VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:33:06 11/07/01 Wed
Author: Michael
Subject: Lauren's a villain?
In reply to: Jamey Lee 's message, "Re: Will Boston Public Catch On?" on 09:48:20 11/07/01 Wed

>Do you think that by
>adding some really cool characters, (like Ronnie),
>that they need to sacrifice a few characters to keep
>their character count down. For us, (who have been
>watching), all the characters have been easy to
>follow, but for someone just starting to watch it
>could be confusing. I think the logical choice might
>be Lauren. Although, Ronnie is different than Lauren,
>they kind of share a niche. I think it would be wrong
>to sacrifice a villain. The villain is an important
>role, and several make it even more fun.

Jamey:

I found myself nodding in approval at everything you said in this post all the way up to the last portion, which I have been kind enough to quote. Are you suggesting that Lauren is a villain? If so, how?

On another note, I think the true sign of a show that can be successful is one that transcends political persuasions, for lack of a better term. Personally, I'd hate to watch a show that was too one-sided on either part of the political spectrum. I wonder if it's proper to be placing "Boston Public" under the "liberal" or "conservative" column, though. People aren't watching the show for its politics, and if they are, well I don't know how much fun those people would be in a social situation ...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-4
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.