VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34567 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, March 23 2005, 13:34:53
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: Not an integral
In reply to: Katerina 's message, "Re: Not an integral" on Wed, March 23 2005, 8:14:11

>Sorry, but "reaching balance with external world" is
>not identical with "living in balance with the group".
Sorry, but for me it is.

>I just gave a few examples of evolutional development.
Somehow these examples where above my head.
>None of the above. I think it is rooted in the second
>law of thermodynamics: any system aims at
>self-destruction.
That's also above my head.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.