VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34567 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, March 27 2005, 11:46:07
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: Not an integral
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "Re: Not an integral" on Wed, March 23 2005, 13:34:53

>U don't make the difference between the whole external
>world and some restricted group, that is the first
>inaccuracy.

For our ancestors the group, and the few groups around them, represented the whole world.

>Why so? U didn't take it into consideration?

Maybe the law of thermodynamics has something to do with what we are discussing but it does not ring a bell for me.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.