VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]67 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, September 10 2003, 7:00:49
Author: Todd
Subject: Any discussion is either Orthodox or Jooish.
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "Better a boring discussion....." on Tue, September 09 2003, 6:43:18

Better a boring discussion about reality then a lively
bullshit discussion.


You must know: There are no such things as "a boring discussion about reality" or "a lively bullshit discussion". Any discussion is either Orthodox or Jooish. The discussion in google is Jooish. So, if you say "better an Orthodox discussion than a Jooish" it will be true. If you say "Better a Jooish discussion than an Orthodox" it will be wrong.


The first question: don't you find it vulgar?
Chun's reaction? No. I find it funny.


Does it mean that Latin quotes are not considered as vulgar in Holland anymore?

But also did not oppose it. He never said he doubts
Nemenyi is Fischer's father.


In the official article Chun wrote:

"When Fischer was born, his mother was married to Hans-Gerhardt Fischer, a German biophysicist, who is generally assumed to be Bobby's father, although Bobby's paternity is the subject of some speculation.)"

And not a single word about Paul Nemenyi.


He is, I tell you and besides the a few mistakes in
life I'm always right.


Don't you find such a claim too conceited?


No offense but you often
>bet on the wrong horse.


It's allright with the horse. Apart from the fact that old Bolivar cannot carry double.


I would not be surprised if Lance is a racist
but this version I doubt.


He sure is a white suprematist, but well, when you don't like my version, what is yers? Why should Lance bluff?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.