Better take this one (your E%^*#%& forum went down again) -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, September 11 2003, 3:18:16
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Better take this one (your E%^*#%& forum went down again)
In reply to: Todd 's message, "Any discussion is either Orthodox or Jooish." on Wed, September 10 2003, 7:00:49

Ergo, if you say, "better a good than a bad discussion" it will be true. If you say "Better a bad discussion than a good discussion" it will be wrong.

>Does it mean that Latin quotes are not considered as

>vulgar in Holland anymore?

I tend to block out bad memories but I sure have to give you this one:-). To answer your question: Latin quotes are very good taste in Holland, only when they are used in a sarcastic way.

>And not a single word about Paul Nemenyi.

And also nothing against him.

>Don't you find such a claim too conceited?

Conceit causes more conversation than wit.

--Duc de La Rochefoucauld (1613-1680)

>He sure is a white suprematist, but well, when you

>don't like my version, what is yers? Why should Lance

>bluff?

The pattern is clear. Lance first suggested some vague conspiracy between Chun and Krabbe. When that was proved false he applied the "escape forward" tactic and used a mysterious source and some mysterious someone who wanted to get even with Bobby Fischer. When that was put to the test he had to think hard and came up with Bobby Ang.

Now I'm very sure the story of Jinky Ong is true so therefore Lance story must be false. It's as simple as that.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut! -- Todd, Thu, September 11 2003, 4:02:18
- Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut! -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, September 11 2003, 8:23:40
  - U are so deadly serious -- Katerina, Thu, September 11 2003, 9:14:21
    - Stop laughing! It is all very serious! -- Todd, Thu, September 11 2003, 10:36:58
  - Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut! -- Todd, Thu, September 11 2003, 10:25:43
    - As hard as it is to fight terrorism by invading Iraq -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 3:35:41
      - Re:...where the Jooz are -- Todd, Fri, September 12 2003, 9:24:41
        Re:...where the Jooz are -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 11:22:06
        Krabbe is very much wrong! -- Todd, Sat, September 13 2003, 1:02:59
        He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Margaret, Fri, September 12 2003, 13:39:00
        Re: He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 17:48:36
        Re: He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Margaret, Tue, September 16 2003, 14:18:13
        Very cool and eloquent dialog! (NT) -- Katerina, Wed, September 17 2003, 1:50:31
        That is true. -- Todd, Fri, September 19 2003, 4:01:26
        Yeah, sure! -- Margaret, Fri, September 19 2003, 13:54:31
        How can you know? -- Todd aka Chinese spy Sun Khuj v Tsaj Vyn Su Khim Pej Sam, Fri, September 19 2003, 3:59:25
        Et tu, Porucznik? -- Margaret, Fri, September 19 2003, 14:10:10