None of the above -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, February 05 2003, 14:16:23
Author: Margaret
Subject: None of the above
In reply to: Katerina 's message, "The values of the XXIth century" on Tue, February 04 2003, 4:23:17

>The topic turned out so
>interesting that almost 300 messages were already
>posted and are being posted now.

Yeah, it is interesting indeed but don't even expect 300 messages here! :-)

>Today in the big cities a man can live alone without
>any problems: he works, buys food, comfort, leisure
>for money.

Work, food, comfort and leisure is not enough for happiness. Such life is empty. You can't do without people that love you, need you and give you all the support.

To have not the only husband but a partner
>for dates is absolutely normal as you don't lose
>anything. Nothing wrong with having several husbands.

'Nothing wrong'. How does she know when she has never been married? Any break is always painful.

>What do you think. Which model is more preferable for
>you: the first one with marriages and children at
>14-16 or the second with marriages at 30 and children
>with 35?

None of the above, but I think the first one is still worse. I agree with Todd, careless teenagers of 14 can't be neither good spouses nor good parents for their children.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: None of the above -- Katerina, Fri, February 07 2003, 4:14:13
- Re: None of the above -- Margaret, Sat, February 08 2003, 14:51:30