Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: Re Ariane's comments about Edmonton convention Author: Ariane [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 21:34:52 02/23/03 Sun Author Host/IP: da-13-088-244-carme.infinetgroup.com/209.87.13.88 In reply to: Marjaleena Repo 's message, "Re: Re Ariane's comments about Edmonton convention" on 20:49:28 02/23/03 Sun Marjaleena, you have a long way to go before you become a Progressive Conservative. But then you don't really aspire that position, do you? We are talking in house here, and an AGM is an AGM and a convention is a convention. No need to run to the dictionary. The two have different purposes. AS VP you should know the difference. As for our youth, they are some of the brightest young people in the country and to suggest that they don't understand economics in our country is doing them a disservice. I will defend their records any time. Suffice to day, the young man made my! PS so what is the number of the motion to oust Orchard. I can't believe I missd it. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date The Resolution was #20 Roger 23:41:53 02/23/03 Sun Re: The Resolution was #20 (NT) -- Mike Redmond, 14:19:26 02/24/03 Mon Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Mike Redmond, 14:24:31 02/24/03 Mon Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Roger, 11:52:49 02/25/03 Tue Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Mike Redmond, 14:09:06 02/25/03 Tue Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Ariane, 20:41:30 02/25/03 Tue Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Roger, 14:11:09 02/26/03 Wed