LMAO "happy as hogs in shit"!! We don't have that in the uk, but seriously... -- THE VENT BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject: LMAO "happy as hogs in shit"!! We don't have that in the uk, but seriously...

Author:
James

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, March 12 2003, 2:49:41 GMT ( - 8 )
In reply to: Mitchell 's message, "..." on Tuesday, March 11 2003, 18:23:16 GMT ( - 8 )

I never realised the Shack has this whole history of stuff - I only found it sorta October last year, and everything has been like love and peace, so this whole thing has been a bit of a shock! I never realied Jimc has this sorta unsavoury past! lol
Aaannyway, I'm glad I found this board! Now I can winge, winge, winge...you'll definitely be seeing me around! lol

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Well GEEZ LOUISE!!! QUACK - Alie he hasn't changed and you have him pegged! Mitchell you should read the replies to my post that Jim left a link to for "his proof that I attack people" (roflmao)

Author:
<:) duck/ed still pink
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, March 12 2003, 11:57:21 GMT ( - 8 )

The url...

GO HERE TO VIEW JIM'S PROOF OF THE ATTACKING DUCK - quack!!

he left and the post in which he states that I attacked both Trevor and him is the one I made on Veterans day. I woke up still groggy and there was Bush addressing Veterans - Admittedly it got me steamed. Nevertheless I attacked NO ONE FROM THE SHACK, ACTUALLY NO ONE OTHER THEN BUSH AND I THINK I HAD A COUPLE OF COMMENTS FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT ALSO -

Perhaps I am more dazzed and confused then I thought - (which would be difficult cause I'm so totally there most of the time) because I'm still scratching my head on why Jim thinks the historic thread that he left a url too will explain things. To Jixi in a reply he made at the shack he leaves this reply in referring to Trevor: "he should never have been attacked angrily and irrationally because his views differed from someone else. But he was attacked (and so was I)".

If anyone here has the time please do me a favor and read the post then READ TREVOR'S and JIM'S RESPONSE TO MY POST - then if you think that I attacked Trevor angrily and irrationally because of his views - or attacked Jim angrily and irrationally because of his views as Jim claims please respond and let me know - I'm absolutely serious because if my rhetoric was an attack on their views and not a response to their blatant attack on me personally, in which I attempted to be reasonable though admittedly sarcastic I need to know cause I can 't see it!. To me the post that Jim left to explain some things just re-enforces everything I said in my last post at the shack, rather then post replies which simply stated their disagreement with the post or even that what I had to say in the post was bullshit with or without evidence to support that, they both teamed up to attack the poster for expressing an opinion and then made me out to be the divisive one.

The post drew replies but the only ones (who would leave their name) that I think could be considered "divisive" were from Jim C. and Trevor. They immediately and vehemently attacked me over and over again with all kinds of accusations. They made the post personal not I, because
they disagreed with my sentiments about Bush. Neither one ever got around to the content of my post or picking out a section of it to state as inaccurate or that it was wrong - they simply slung dirt at the poster and made it a point how divisive I was being and how I was destroying the
board etc etc etc- As they attacked I attempted to refrain from engaging in the same behavior that they did, but admittedly did get sarcastic in some of my replies to their rhetoric and rhetoric it was that Jim used as he brought up every subject under the sun and a few not even in our
galaxy,

He misquoted not exactly what he did was he used a quote totally out of context which was an apology that I made when Comsie withdrew from the shack and took the name with him - Of course he omited the fact that it was Alie, Wolfie and myself that kept the place alive after he withdrew - until with much effort we build it back to a place that Comsie felt he could once again associate his name with even though he stated at the time "he never would come back or have anything to do with it again" (I understand why at the time he was so furious as the personal arguments and attacks that were going on were very painful to him as he watched friend attack friend and this is against everything that he stands for and has written about). We restored it to a place that was once again a friendly active family of individuals who could disagree yet not 'fight' each other and Comsie returned
and admitted that he was proud of the community and its behavior at the time - and Jim had the balls to use some out of context quotes from me where I apologized to Comsie for my involvement in the uproar that was going on even though in reality what my efforts were was an attempt to
put a stop to the bickering that had been brought to the shack from another board, and Comsie understood that completely.

I made a post about the service record of the President and my opinion of him because of his service record Jim C and Trevor both went on and on about me about this and that and everything except the posts content and then he uses this as an example of how I have attacked people on the board.

For Jim to use that as an historic example of my attacks on other Shackers I find incredulous - Sure I got a bit defensive after attacked but nowhere near the name calling that Trevor unleashed.

All I can say is THANK YOU Jim you have by your diligent saving of shack posts and you selfless (quack haha) re-posting of it, gone to extroardinary lenghts to enforce everything that I said in my last post at the shack about Trevor's and your behavior!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]