VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):


Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9]10 ]
     
Subject: Apparently your looking to see if you can obtain simple answers to complex questions....


Author:
<:)duck
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Friday, November 14 2003, 7:22:30 GMT ( - 8 )
In reply to: brattyratty 's message, "Test" on Wednesday, November 12 2003, 20:31:26 GMT ( - 8 )

To Question A: Murder is Murder regardless of whether the state sanctions it or not. If the state takes the life of a convicted felon or murderer they are Murdering that individual. If soldiers take the life of other soldiers or civilians they are indeed murdering those other soldiers and/or civilians. No individual or government body has the right to terminate the existance of any individual.

HOWEVER - any individual or society HAS THE RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE AND TO PROTECT THEMSELVES IF AN AGRESSOR OR AN AGRESSOR NATION ATTACKS THEM and if in protecting themselves they TERMINEATE THE EXISTENCE OF OTHERS IT IS STILL MURDER BUT MY PERSONAL BELIEF IS THAT IN CASES OF SELF DEFENSE IT IS MITIGATED AND THE ULTIMATE JUDGE WILL RECOGNIZE THE MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES.

TO ANSWER B: Depends on the society - If the society is one where the membership has by a majority agreed to pool a percentage of their personal resources for the good of all and they have the right to freely depart and locate themselves elsewhere not under the control of that society then the tax is by no means theft. If the society is dictatorial or controlled by a small elite segment and they impose their will including a tax structure on the populace then by all means it is theft.

YOU MAY WRITE 10,000 CONTRARY WORDS ON THIS BRATTY AND IT WILL HAVE LITTLE SIGNIFICANCE - SIMPLY BECAUSE THE ABOVE WAS WRITTEN BY "THE Duck" and one must NEVER FORGET RULE NUMBER 1 OF THE COSMOS.

COSMIC RULE #1 THE DUCK IS ALWAYS RIGHT
COSMIC RULE #2 IF IN DOUBT REFER TO RULE #1

<:)THE Duck

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]



Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.