VoyForums

Support VoyForums by visiting our sponsor, www.PainEase.com.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2004, 7:16:29
Author: MKIceman
Subject: Re: Um... confused
In reply to: Tortie 's message, "Re: Um... confused" on Thu, Apr 22 2004, 2:53:42

>>>First, this is yet another personal insult that
>avoids
>>>the issue, commuting the argument to my methodology
>>>(i.e., use of tact). Yet I'll still bite.
>>
>>(shakes head)
>><B>Matt:</B> Your methodology _is_ the point. I have
>>much less concern over what you have to say than how
>>you are saying it.
>
>I agree with, Heywood. Your methodology is the root
>of all this strife. It's not what you say but how you
>say it.

Ah, so, unless I am mistaken, you and others believe that I must be tactful when I make a critical comment, for fear of insulting the recipient?

I just so happen to agree. But I find it interesting that I am being asked this by those who are not so tactful in their criticisms -- or outright personal insults -- of those who, they feel, are inferior to them (i.e., obsessive fans).

So is this a one-way street, with double-standards, or must we all adhere to the standards we set forth?

--Matt

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Additionally -- MKIceman, Thu, Apr 22 2004, 8:53:25

  • Re: Additionally -- Chainsawmidget, Thu, Apr 22 2004, 17:13:19



    Forum timezone: GMT-3
    VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.