VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, Apr 22 2004, 11:49:37
Author: Vanessa
Subject: Re: The word "pompous"
In reply to: MKIceman 's message, "Re: The word "pompous"" on Thu, Apr 22 2004, 10:02:49

>Tilly posted:
>>The rest of your post is just pompousity. :/

Agreed, Tilly.

>According to the Oxford Dictionary, the word "pompous"
>means "self-important."

Which is exactly how you come across, with your thread hijacking, spamming and then pointing out if we 'OMG!' post in the wrong thread, that we're wrong for doing so. Oh need I mention the 'Board vs Chatroom' and other threads you posted, wherein you acted like you were the be all and end all of the board, GAFF's saviour?

The decision is not yours to make and if it is, I'm sure the members of my board, most of whom are not Heywood groupies, will thank me for providing a haven to mock badfic in peace.

Pompous? That's how you have behaved, there is no proof here within your posts to prove otherwise.

>I find it interesting that, of all people, you -- the
>person who brags that her cleavage can enslave men --
>accuse me of being pompous, despite all my posts
>discussing ego and arrogance.

Oh so an obvious joke, a clearly made jest about the cleavage is wrong, whilst your so called 'joke' about hanging on to Heywood's testicles and such, that you insisted was a joke, is perfectly acceptable?

I note by the above, you have taken the cleavage joke too seriously. Yet it is also in your opinion, Heywood took your comments about him too seriously.

Oh what double standards we have here. Pot, meet kettle.

>--Matt
~ Vanessa.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:





Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.