Re: Previous Post -- Godawful Fan Fiction

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, Apr 14 2004, 14:55:01
Author: Heywood
Subject: Re: Previous Post
In reply to: MKIceman 's message, "Re: Previous Post" on Wed, Apr 14 2004, 14:22:54

>>I think that may be why Heywood is more than a little
>>peeved.
>
>On the contrary, I think this is a matter of ego.

Oh really? It's nice how you can just assume what I'm thinking and use it as a basis for your statements like that.

>>Just a thought. Please don't torch me. And no, no I
>>am not a Heywood worshipper (entirely).
>
>Unlike some, I don't flame. I respond as objectively
>as possible. The amount of tact (i.e.,
>"sugar-coating") used depends upon the topic and
>participants (e.g., ability to handle cold reasoning).

Neither one of us is flaming. I told you I was offended by your statements, when you implied I engaged in sexual activity with minors.
And I hate to tell you, if you don't use tact, I fear for your social standing. I mean, the first time somebody asks you "does this make me look fat?" or "what do you think of this?"... Tact is a social nicety, not a sign of an ability or lack thereof to handle reasoning.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Previous Post -- MKIceman, Wed, Apr 14 2004, 15:01:01