VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45678 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, Apr 14 2004, 15:01:01
Author: MKIceman
Subject: Re: Previous Post
In reply to: Heywood 's message, "Re: Previous Post" on Wed, Apr 14 2004, 14:55:01

>>On the contrary, I think this is a matter of ego.
>
>Oh really? It's nice how you can just assume what I'm
>thinking and use it as a basis for your statements
>like that.

Please don't assume an elaboration of my statements where none was given. I refer you to Ilse's and my discussion on flames vs. ego.

>>Unlike some, I don't flame. I respond as objectively
>>as possible. The amount of tact (i.e.,
>>"sugar-coating") used depends upon the topic and
>>participants (e.g., ability to handle cold reasoning).
>
>Neither one of us is flaming. I told you I was
>offended by your statements, when you implied I
>engaged in sexual activity with minors.

See this post:

<a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.voy.com/13774/26108.html">http://www.voy.com/13774/26108.html</a>

>And I hate to tell you, if you don't use tact, I fear
>for your social standing. I mean, the first time
>somebody asks you "does this make me look fat?" or
>"what do you think of this?"... Tact is a social
>nicety, not a sign of an ability or lack thereof to
>handle reasoning.

Please don't assume a lack of an elaboration when an elaboration was given: "depends on the topic and participants."

--Matt

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]



Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.