VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:37:02 06/09/01 Sat
Author: Rich
Subject: Go on, just watch story six!

I really can't be f***** arsed with people mailing me about my reviews these days, I just really can't! I think it shows some arrogance to mail someone, like the twat who did three months ago, and go "This is what I think is wrong with your reviewing style" - then you read theirs on the IMDb and it's complete f****** horseshit that a three year old could do better. Anyway, I just got a new mail through the IMDb post system:


The Worsed Review Ever

I read your review on The Breakfast Club, and I found it humorous to tell you the truth. John Hughes Films are always about issues that normal teenagers live through, John Hughes is NOT making art films, nor a massive statement. He is simply using materials that teenagers can relate to. I foun many statements in your review that any John Hughes Fans would find complimentary to his work, and only would support his intentions. So-called "amatuer psychology" IS the level at which teens think. However, the bottom line is that after 15 years teens are still watching and still relating to his work, and that is the only intention John Hughes ever had. Before you can critique, you need to have some idea, or some hypothisis of the artists intentions. Otherwise you have nothing to base any judgement by, except predefined, an inaccurate definitions of art.

"Before I can critique"? Fuckin' 'ell, I need this piece of shit's permission, obviously! So I replied:


"(That should be "worse" review btw) You know, normally I'd go to the trouble to argue this point with you, but I really can't be bothered.

The arrogance with which you mail me, proclaiming that my review is the "worst ever" when you can't even have the care to spell correctly is beyond belief.

Basically, I don't NEED to know what was going through John Hughes' mind, what he had to eat that morning or when was the last time he did a poo on the toilet... I was writing the review from my subjective opinion and if you don't like it then write your own review instead of mailing people to criticise theirs. As I said, normally I would argue this point, but I presented my opinion and if you didn't like it, tough!"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:




Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.