Re: Congratulations Mr. Peter Law.Well said Jamie! Wahat I cannot understand is why all canvassing literature in our household was addressed to myself and not my husband. or both. Was not my husbands vote worthy of canvassing for? He is the Labour supporter in my household. Sorry but by sendingi t to me it simply went in the bin and he never got the chance to see it anyway. They could have gained a vote -- Abertillery Online Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:42:18 05/12/05 Thu
Author: Carolyn
Subject: Re: Congratulations Mr. Peter Law.Well said Jamie! Wahat I cannot understand is why all canvassing literature in our household was addressed to myself and not my husband. or both. Was not my husbands vote worthy of canvassing for? He is the Labour supporter in my household. Sorry but by sendingi t to me it simply went in the bin and he never got the chance to see it anyway. They could have gained a vote
In reply to: Jamie McCarthy 's message, "Re: Congratulations Mr. Peter Law. Peter was qouted in the press saying something along the lines of 'I just thought I'de dent the majority to make a point' , nah! Peter, you had them worried before the vote. I've voted Labour all my life, but I'm bu*ggered if I can remember a time when Labour sent their 'front row' down to canvass." on 21:52:38 05/11/05 Wed

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

What do preople think abvout the possibility of Peter Law rejoining the Labour Party? My view is that it would be wrong simoply becasue he stood as an independent and so may have attracted votes from people who would NOT have supported Labour. I believe he has a moral obligation to stay independent. (NT) -- DC, 12:25:59 05/13/05 Fri
- Re: What do preople think abvout the possibility of Peter Law rejoining the Labour Party? My view is that it would be wrong simoply becasue he stood as an independent and so may have attracted votes from people who would NOT have supported Labour. I believe he has a moral obligation to stay independent. -- Martyn, 15:08:03 05/13/05 Fri
  - Re:Sorry, deleted the previous line! I watched a tv program last week, during which they interviewed the local Labour rep, Peter Law and Peter Hain. There was some mention of Peter Law's reasons for standing as being more to do with his ego than his politics, I have no idea, I've never met the man. However, what did sadden me was the arrogance of Peter Hain ... what ever happened to 'a party of the people, for the people'? I'm completely disheartened by the bombastic, prefect-like, attitude of New Labour. For the first time since I've been able to vote, my apathy knows no bounds. Ok, whinge over. (NT) -- Jamie McCarthy., 22:58:43 05/16/05 Mon

Forum timezone: GMT+1
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.