VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, May 13, 6:26:55 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22/01/05 1:16
Author: 日日是好日
Subject: Re: 回應1月19日明報副刊關麗珊專欄「窮人不是這樣的」一文。
In reply to: sin 's message, "回應1月19日明報副刊關麗珊專欄「窮人不是這樣的」一文。" on 21/01/05 2:29

什麼才算出頭?
多才多藝與精於一項那個成本效益大?
不夠富有=窮?
有博士學位就必可脫貧?
學院教育是唯一吸收知識之途?
學院教育就可保證抓更多錢?
富戶子女可得好教育進而得好成績,在結構性貧窮中也不愁出路?

先天不足就不必再向上爭取?只能被動的聽天由命?怨天尤人?

今天本地會有人因窮而沒吃沒穿沒片瓦遮頭?
今天會有人因衣食住行不夠生活圈子的他人好而顧影自憐?

今天社會及家長每天灌輸了什麼給下一代?多數人認同的就不會錯?多數人走的路就必合子女?

社工為何對一筆過撥款及同時資源增值默默承受,鮮見積極爭取合理資源的動作呢?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: 回應1月19日明報副刊關麗珊專欄「窮人不是這樣的」一文。 -- wong king hei, 24/01/05 17:39
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.