VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, May 13, 1:17:44 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 24/01/05 17:39
Author: wong king hei
Subject: Re: 回應1月19日明報副刊關麗珊專欄「窮人不是這樣的」一文。
In reply to: sin 's message, "回應1月19日明報副刊關麗珊專欄「窮人不是這樣的」一文。" on 21/01/05 2:29

窮，有誰願意窮呢？
貧窮的負面影響十分明顯，其中最令人惋惜的是：青少年會失去很多機會，而這些機會是別的青少年很容易得到。
因此，世界各地都有多人去幫助窮人，而滅貧也成了很多政府的工作。問題是怎樣去辦，怎樣才辦得好。
冼昭行先生*當社工，很好。
關麗珊小姐*教寫作，不錯。
這方面，大家都有心，亦很盡力，只是方法不同別了。既然方法多的是，這說明了大家的思考方式不同，重點也不同。
因此在了解他人的觀點時，大家真的要小心，避免因主觀而產生誤解。在基層裡耳聞目睹，冼先生深刻體會貧窮，正常不過；誤解關小姐的文章的主旨，更是正常。關小姐在文章裡有沒有以偏概全去無理指責窮人呢？答案是否定的。如不清楚，請大家再讀一遍。若只因為別人的觀點不同或不了解其觀點，即大興問罪之師，是不是太過份呢？
建立內在品格和個人能耐，對貧者來說或者不見得有立竿見影之效，但我們正是忽略這些事的重要性和長遠影響的，而變得只見目前需要。有誰來幫助部份貧者了解這個道理？

*筆者假設冼氏是位男仕和關氏是位女仕。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • Re: 回應1月19日明報副刊關麗珊專欄「窮人不是這樣的」一文。 -- Jacob, 13/02/05 3:16
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT+8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.