VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, April 28, 8:23:18 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 28/09/03 23:28
Author: Anger
Subject: Re: 《紅》的命運故事
In reply to: 不是幾米迷 's message, "Re: 《紅》的命運故事" on 28/09/03 15:53

你說到「一個專欄作者，應該可以嚴謹一點，負責任一點。」我倒十分贊成。
如果你覺得關麗珊的行文應該「可以認真一點，不是那麼輕率」。就讓我舉一個「行文比關麗珊更不認真、更輕率」的例子給你知。
明報某一位專欄作家，在其專欄中分享甚麼人格育子理論，卻從沒有指出他到底是引述那一學派、那一學者的理論，其後又在專欄中介紹不同年紀的小孩子的甚麼特性。如果這種做法出現在學術圈子，相信這人早已被唾棄，如今卻藉著寫專欄來沽名釣譽，正是捉準了文學世界裡難以界定的「抄襲」原則，所寫一切內容都缺乏原創意念，當專欄文章結集成書後，此人就被抬舉了。此人的人格，可見一斑。
天下間，意難平的事多不勝數，你會擇善固執？還是隨波逐流？

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.