VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, April 28, 22:15:11 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 28/09/03 15:53
Author: 不是幾米迷
Subject: Re: 《紅》的命運故事
In reply to: P 's message, "《紅》的命運故事" on 27/09/03 22:48

謝謝你的理性回應。
為延讀理性討論的精神，你可否告訴我，
你如何定義「抄襲」？
我說你該篇文章站不住腳，是因為你沒有充分舉證
《向》如何「抄襲」，但就在文中直接指他「抄襲」，對作者
及其作品不夠公平。最後只是態度曖昧地叫人自己去看看作品，
就知道一二。問題是，我仔細看過了三部作品，
同意有部分有牽連的地方，但不覺得幾米抄襲另外二人。
我想說，我並不特別喜歡《向》，也不是要維護甚麼。
不過，我覺得一個專欄作者，應該可以嚴謹一點，負責任一點。
我認為在創作裡，「抄襲」是一項極嚴重的行為，
可以徹底消滅一個作者的誠信。
你指控一個現在擁有很多讀者，
有許多年輕人從他的書中得到啟發的繪本作者「抄襲」，
是很嚴重的指控，
我覺得你的行文可以認真一點，不是那麼輕率，欲言又止的，
至少我覺得無法令人信服。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.